Archive for Health care reform

Obama’s Lawyer: Don’t Like the Individual Mandate? Just Make Less Money

In what can only be described as an incredulous turn of events, the Obama administration has gone from arguing “it’s a tax” to “make less money” in its effort to stave off legal challenges to the healthcare reform law.

Originally, the administration had tried to argue that the penalty for not purchasing individual coverage was just a tax, and as such, clearly met constitutional muster under the Taxing Clause.  But that argument has seen its better day, especially after being shredded apart by one lone Federal Judge in Florida.

Noting that the purchase requirement only kicks in after a minimal amount of income, acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal suggested to a Sixth Circuit panel that the way around the mandate simply is to make less money.  In most cases, a LOT LESS money.  Since even an hourly employee at McDonald’s would presumably make too much to avoid the mandate, most people would not make enough money to buy weekly groceries if they wanted to ensure that their income would not trigger the mandate.

This shows how desperate the administration is to salvage this mess – at any cost.  Instead of going back to the table and finding workable solutions with Republicans, the Democrats have held steady while their ship sinks deeper and deeper in the troubled legal waters.

As I’ve mentioned previously on this blog, we all had better hope that the court system shuts the door on this silly idea that the Government can force people to buy individual products or services from private companies.  Otherwise, we may all be forced to buy broccoli – if the Government says we must.

Our legal system has all but eradicated the 10th Amendment.  Hopefully, the Tenth can regain some footing during this process.

CDR

McDonald’s plays chicken-nuggets with the Goverment over mini-meds

Perhaps you have heard the story about McDonald’s threatening to cancel one of its limited benefit health plans.  As I understand it, this plan costs participating employees only about $500 a year in premium contributions (about $35 to $40 per month) but the kicker is that the plan maxes out its benefits at $2,000.  To the extent my understanding is accurate, employees are paying 25% of the maximum benefit in premiums – which is steep.  But, to be fair, those plans tend to pay benefits right away without having to go through large deductibles, etc.  There’s a reason the cost is so steep – they are highly utilized.

When the Government informed McDonald’s that this type of health plan was no longer valid, McDonald’s responded by threatening to cancel the coverage altogether.  In response, the Government (via Secretary Sebelius) blinked and allowed McDonald’s to have a waiver which effectively allows them to continue the sub-par coverage for at least a year.  To date over 100 other large companies – AND UNIONS – have filed for and been granted the same types of waivers for health plans that do not meet the definition of acceptable coverage under Obamacare.

Whether it’s a good idea for McDonald’s to offer such coverage is beyond the scope of this post.  Instead, my point is to highlight the bigger picture, which is, that everyone is having their “right-to-choose” taken away from them by the Government.  And you thought the Democrats were the “right-to-choose” party, right?  Guess again.  Nothing like Obamacare to make it clear – they think they know what is best for you and by golly you are going to like it.

Granted, healthcare costs are getting higher and higher.  Affordable premiums are a thing of the past.  Nevertheless, the Government is forcing people into Cadillac health plans – they are forcing people to pay higher and higher premiums, and they are doing it on purpose.

Once Obamacare kicks into full force in 2014, you will no longer have the right to purchase limited benefit plans of any kind.  This includes the “mini-med” plans like McDonald’s offers but it also includes full coverage plans that happen to have high deductibles – like really high (higher than HSA-qualified levels).  For example, you will not be able to buy a $25,000 deductible plan that pays 100% after the deductible – because the  Government says the deductible is too high.  Never mind the premiums – the deductible is too high.  Common sense would dictate that the limited number of folks opting for those types of plans would be in a better position to know whether they can afford the higher deductible.  The Government thinks their sense should take precedence.

Want your freedom of choice returned?  Urge your representative and senators to repeal Obamacare.  When your Democratic representatives and Senators balk – throw the “right-to-choose” back in their face by asking:  “I thought you supported the right to choose.”

CBO confirms – Obamacare will increase prescription drug costs

Contrary to the stated objective of passing Obamacare by the Democrats, the CBO has confirmed that the law will increase, not decrease, the costs of prescription drugs for all Americans.

The CBO Report is here.

This time, the free-spending liberals cannot blame conservatives for scare-tactic politics.  After all, the CBO is an independent governmental entity.

Interestingly though, the CBO has reached the same conclusion presented by conservative Republicans prior to healthcare reform votes – that the legislation would increase, not decrease, the cost of healthcare.

The Report was created at the request of Congressman Paul Ryan who stands to be the single most powerful person in Washington come January.  Mr. Ryan is a wizard at governmental finance and it’s safe to say he is the number one fear of all free-spending liberals.  As the future Chair of the House Committee on the Budget, he will wield enormous power.

Thankfully he is on our side – the side of the people.

WordPress SEO