Archive for Commentary

Stop using your health insurance!

Over-utilization is the concept that too much of something is being used, or utilized. As it applies to health care, over-utilization is another one of (way too) many behind-the-scenes reasons why health care costs are so out of control.

A big reason for this is that current benefits rich plans do little if anything to discourage usage. Low co-pays encourage people to go more often even when over the counter stuff would work as well. Fee for service in Medicare encourages extra visits so the docs can pay for their fine Lexus automobiles. And the list goes on.

Here’s an article from townhall.com that provides more details if you’re interested.

The truth about health insurance (finally)

People may tend not to believe what I say about health insurance because, well, perhaps I am biased.

So here’s what the Wall Street Journal has to say about the (alleged) mess with health insurance – and by the way, I agree with every word in this article, which is why I am sharing it with you.

First, it’s important to understand that 90%, fully 9 out of 10 working Americans, are covered under a health plan where they work. Most people are pretty happy with their plans too — they should be, given the enormous subsidies employers are forced to pay (which makes GROUP coverage seem “cheap” to those covered).

The horror stories Obama is using to scare the rest of us have nothing to do with GROUP insurance – those stories have to do with INDIVIDUAL coverage, often after someone leaves the cozy mother-nest of group coverage.

So that leaves us with only about 10% of the marketplace that has a real problem of any kind (other than cost). Give or take, that’s about 15 million people, which includes the self-employed and those who have to otherwise fend for themselves.

Several ideas Obama is proposing have already PROVEN TO BE DISASTROUS in several states; namely, New York, New Jersey, and Massachusetts. Why in the world would anyone want to take ideas proven to be bad and implement them nationally?

Fundamentally, it has to be because of a gross misunderstanding of the scope of the real problem. There is no other explanation.

In fact, however, changes proposed will actually serve to further increase, not decrease costs, both in higher premiums AND higher taxes.

Will they system then be “fixed?”

Of course not – many people will be forced to simply opt out and “pay the fine.” Then what?

The cycle will get even more vicious – that’s what!

Here’s to hoping that more informative articles such as this one from WSJ will help people understand that the scope of the fix should be narrowed to more closely fit the scope of the problem.

Obama’s Health Plan: Canada on the installment plan

If people truly want to know the scoop on health plan proposals made both by Obama and McCain, all they need to do is read “the Journal.”

Once again, the WSJ has nailed it.

This time, the tag line to the story reads (correctly):  Obama supports huge tax subsidies for the wealthy.

What’s funny is, he doesn’t even seem to realize it.

At the core of McCain’s plan is the idea that a 40 year old concept is outdated.  By inticing employers to buy health insurance through the use of tax breaks, the government is providing a huge disincentive — the opposite of responsibility.

It’s the McCain plan, not Obama’s, that actually is progressive.

As the article states:

For reasons of historical accident and lobbying clout, individuals who buy policies get no tax benefits and pay with after-tax dollars. Mr. McCain is proposing to make the tax benefits available to everyone, regardless of how they purchase their insurance.

In contrast, Obama doesn’t want workers to have a choice in their health care.  He claims that McCain’s plan

would amount to “taxing your health-care benefits for the first time in history,” which is a wild distortion. His point seems to be that because companies wouldn’t have to pay for health care, they could raise wages and thus taxes would also increase for workers on those higher incomes. But doesn’t Mr. Obama want higher wages?

Why this discussion is not getting more air underneath its wings is beyond me.  Unfortunately, the candidates are happy to discuss their plans at a highly superficial level, which leaves the rest of us out in the dark.

So do yourself a favor — read the article from the Times and pass it on to others.

Here is the link to the WSJ article.

WordPress SEO